Leeper et al v. Connecticut Valley Arms Inc et al
Terry Michael Leeper and Bonnie T Leeper |
Connecticut Valley Arms Inc, D C 1980 Inc, Blackpowder Products, Inc., Dikar S Coop Ltd A, Browning International S A and Sportsmans Guide Inc |
6:2012cv00089 |
January 19, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Lafayette Office |
Acadia |
C Michael Hill |
Richard T Haik |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 SUA SPONTE JURISDICTIONAL BRIEFING ORDER: In their complaint, the plaintiffs allege that this Court has jurisdiction, under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, because the parties are diverse in citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00. T he undersigned reviewed the pleadings and determined that an amount in controversy exceeding the jurisdictional threshold is facially apparent. With regard to the diversity of citizenship, however, the plaintiffs allegations are insufficient. IT IS O RDERED that, not later than twenty-one days after the date of this order, the plaintiffs shall file a memorandum setting forth specific facts that support a finding that the parties are diverse in citizenship. These facts should be supported with summary-judgment-type evidence. The defendants will then be allowed seven days to respond to the removing defendants submission. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna on 10/27/2012. (crt,Putch, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.