Ramos et al v. Conway et al
| Jovanny Diaz Ramos, Jose Alberto Ramirez and Javier Enriquez Castillo |
| Jacqueline S Conway, Hartt Transportation Systems Inc and CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 6:2012cv00699 |
| March 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lafayette Office |
| Acadia |
| Rebecca F Doherty |
| C Michael Hill |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 103 Report and Recommendations,. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims filed by plaintiff, Javier Enriquez Castillo, be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard T Haik, Sr on 7/21/14. (crt,Jordan, P)
|
|
Filing
104
MEMORANDUM RULING re 90 MOTION to Dismiss All Claims of Plaintiff, Jovany Diaz Ramos, MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jacqueline S Conway, Canal Insurance Co, Paul Conway. Signed by Judge Richard T Haik, Sr on 7/3/14. (crt,Jordan, P)
|
|
Filing
85
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 72 Report and Recommendations,. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the trial of this matter is rescheduled to October 6, 2014 and the Clerk of Court is to re-issue a Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Richard T Haik, Sr on 10/23/13. (crt,Jordan, P)
|
|
Filing
77
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 68 Report and Recommendations; granting 52 Joint/Voluntary Motion to Dismiss; however, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the dismissal of Mr. Ramirez claims is DEFERRED until after the Court has ruled on the Motion for Contempt; denying as moot 40 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 40 Motion for Sanctions; denying as moot 40 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 8/8/13. (crt,Jordan, Paula)
|
|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM RULING: Considering the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that this Court declines to adopt the recommendation of the magistrate judge with respect to the "Motion to Dismiss All Claims and for Contempt, Sanctions and Attorney's Fees [Doc . 40], but rather, REMANDS the motion to the magistrate judge for further consideration, including a determination of whether the medical records in question were falsified by any party, if possible. On remand, the magistrate judge is asked to addre ss the issue of dismissal and/or contempt vis-a-vis each plaintiff, as described in this Ruling. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the "Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment of Dismissal" [Doc. 54] is DENIED AS MOOT, and the Court's Order of Dism issal [Doc. 53] is VACATED pursuant to Rule 60(a). Ramirez's "Rule 41 Motion to Dismiss" is hereby REFERRED to the magistrate judge for report and recommendation in conjunction with the pending "Motion to Dismiss All Claims and for Contempt, Sanctions and Attorney's Fees" [Doc. 40]. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 6/10/2013. (crt,Putch, A) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/12/2013: # 1 Notice of Manual Attachment-Sealed Exhibt A) (Putch, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
