Bourque v. Tesco Crop et al

Bourque v. Tesco Crop et al

Plaintiff:	Jack Bourque
Defendant:	Tesco Corp
Case Number:	6:2012cv02325
Filed:	September 6, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office:	Lafayette Office
County:	La Salle
Presiding Judge:	Rebecca F Doherty
Presiding Judge:	Patrick J Hanna
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 5, 2012	Filing 8 MEMORANDUM RULING Because the merits of the underlying dispute are not being adjudicated by this Court, the Court concludes dismissal without prejudice is appropriate. It is ORDERED that eh Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration ] 6 filed by def endant Tesco Corporation (US), appearing to be well-founded in law and fact and being unopposed by the plaintiff, is hereby GRANTED. The plaintiff shall submit his claim for workers compensation retaliatory discharge to TESCO according to the procedu res and policies of the TDRP, which may or may not include arbitration, and all claims asserted by the plaintiff in the instant lawsuit are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, because the instant ruling appears to resolve all pending claims in this lawsuit, the parties shall submit a Final Judgment, approved as to form, within ten (10) days of the date of this Ruling. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 11/05/12. (crt,Guidry, C)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 5, 2012

Filing 8 MEMORANDUM RULING Because the merits of the underlying dispute are not being adjudicated by this Court, the Court concludes dismissal without prejudice is appropriate. It is ORDERED that eh Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration ] 6 filed by def endant Tesco Corporation (US), appearing to be well-founded in law and fact and being unopposed by the plaintiff, is hereby GRANTED. The plaintiff shall submit his claim for workers compensation retaliatory discharge to TESCO according to the procedu res and policies of the TDRP, which may or may not include arbitration, and all claims asserted by the plaintiff in the instant lawsuit are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, because the instant ruling appears to resolve all pending claims in this lawsuit, the parties shall submit a Final Judgment, approved as to form, within ten (10) days of the date of this Ruling. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 11/05/12. (crt,Guidry, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bourque v. Tesco Crop et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jack Bourque
Represented By:	Robert M Martina
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Tesco Corp
Represented By:	Kevin A Marks
Represented By:	Jennifer L Sinder
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?