Rivas et al v. Riceland Crawfish, Inc. et al
| Alondra Cejudo Rivas, Maria Sonia Cejudo Rivas, Zachary Thibodeaux, James Thomas and Carolina Avila Icedo |
| Dexter Guillory and Beaucoup Crawfish of Eunice Inc |
| 6:2012cv02610 |
| October 1, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lafayette Office |
| Lafayette |
| C Michael Hill |
| Richard T Haik |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
JUDGMENT...granting 54 Motion for Settlement; granting 54 Motion for Attorney Fees; re 57 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that the SETTLEMENT IS APPROVED. The claims of Reginald Hardy, Dana Darbonne and Vincent Gallow are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and the claims of the remainder of the collective action members are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard T Haik, Sr on 10/28/14. (crt,Jordan, P)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER: The Court has been advised that the parties have reached a settlement in this case which has been conditionally certified a collective action. Accordingly, a Motion for court approval of the settlement shall be filed within ninety (90) days. Upon filing, the Motion shall be set for hearing before the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Michael Hill on 05/06/2014. (crt,Yocum, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
