Mayberry v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
| Neda Mayberry |
| Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C |
| 6:2014cv00478 |
| March 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lafayette Office |
| St. Landry |
| Patrick J Hanna |
| Richard T Haik |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM RULING and ORDER: For the reasons recited herein, the plaintiff's 26 Motion to Compel Additional 30(b)(6) Testimony of Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C is GRANTED. The defendants' related 29 Motion for Protec tive Order is DENIED, to the extent it is inconsistent with this Ruling. Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Defendants' shall notify the plaintiff and the Court within 5 days whether the supplemental 30(b)(6) deposition will take place in Bentonville, Arkansas, or whether Defendants representative(s) will appear in Louisiana. While this court cannot order that the supplemental deposition take place in Opelousas, Louisiana, any travel costs incurred by plaintiff's counsel for completion of the deposition will be borne by defendant. Upon agreement regarding the location, the deposition should be completed without further delay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna on 1/29/2015. (crt,Putch, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
