Clark v. Dixon Correction Institute
Plaintiff: Wilbert Clark
Defendant: Warden Dixon Correctional Institute
Case Number: 6:2014cv02326
Filed: July 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Lafayette Office
County: East Feliciana
Presiding Judge: C Michael Hill
Presiding Judge: Richard T Haik
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 10 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 8 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that this petition for habeas corpus be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as time-barred by the provisions of 28 U.S.C.2244(d). Signed by Judge Richard T Haik, Sr on 12/10/14. (crt,Jordan, P)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark v. Dixon Correction Institute
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden Dixon Correctional Institute
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wilbert Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?