Mays et al v. Chevron Pipe Line Co et al
| Peggy Mays, Daphne Lanclos, Brent Mays and Jared Mays |
| Chevron Pipe Line Co and Chevron Midstream Pipelines L L C |
| 6:2014cv03098 |
| October 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lafayette Office |
| Vermilion |
| Rebecca F Doherty |
| C Michael Hill |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
251
RULING AND ORDER denying as moot 232 Motion to Amend Judgment denying 233 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. ; denying 233 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or New Trial on Furmanite Lack of OCS Operations; denying 234 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or New Trial on Substantial Nexus; granting in part and denied in part 235 Motion for Remittitur. Signed by Judge Brian A Jackson on 6/17/2019. (crt,Williams, L)
|
|
Filing
213
RULING AND ORDER granting 207 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION in Limine Regarding the OSHA Citation Issued to CPL. Signed by Judge Brian A Jackson on 1/25/2019. (crt,Williams, L)
|
|
Filing
205
RULING AND ORDER granting 174 MOTION in Limine. Signed by Judge Brian A Jackson on 1/16/2019. (crt,Williams, L)
|
|
Filing
196
RULING AND ORDER: Before the Court is Chevron Pipe Line Co's 161 Motion in Limine to exclude a post-accident investigation report. For the reasons that follow, the 161 Motion is DENIED. Signed by Judge Brian A Jackson on 1/9/2019. (crt,Putch, A)
|
|
Filing
156
RULING AND ORDER denying 72 Motion in Limine; denying 74 Motion in Limine; denying 80 Motion in Limine; denying 82 Motion in Limine; denying 83 Motion in Limine; denying 116 Motion in Limine; denying 146 Motion to Bifurcate; denying 147 Motion for Hearing; denying 154 MOTION to Modify 128 Scheduling Order, MOTION for Reconsideration of 152 Order denying Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Brian A Jackson on 9/14/2018. (crt,Williams, L)
|
|
Filing
113
MEMORANDUM RULING re 101 MOTION to Amend 98 Memorandum Ruling to Certify for Interlocutory Appeal, MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal filed by Chevron Pipe Line Co. For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 5/16/2017. (crt,Guidry, C)
|
|
Filing
98
MEMORANDUM RULING For the reason set forth above, the Court finds there are triable issues of fact which preclude summary judgment. Accordingly, plaintiffs' 89 MOTION for Reconsideration is GRANTED, and the 29 MOTION for Summary Judgm ent filed by Chevron Midstream Pipelines L L C, Chevron Pipe Line Co is DENIED to the extent it seeks dismissal of the claims brought by plaintiffs against Chevron Pipe Line Company. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 1/10/17. (crt,Guidry, C)
|
|
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM RULING For the following reasons, the 63 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Chevron Midstream Pipelines, LLC is GRANTED. As all claims in this matter have now been dismissed, the parties are ORDERED to submit a proposed final judgment, approved as to form, within fifteen days of issuance of this Ruling. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 3/2/16. (crt,Guidry, C)
|
|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM RULING 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted to the extent is seeks dismissal of the claims brought by plaintiffs against Chevron Pipe Line Company; the motion is denied to the extent it seeks dismissal of plaintiffs' claims against Chevron Midstream Pipelines, LLC. The motion to Strike 50 MOTION to Strike is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 2/23/16. (crt,Guidry, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
