Babin v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff: Charles Ellis Babin, Jr
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 6:2014cv03312
Filed: November 20, 2014
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Lafayette Office
County: St. Landry
Referring Judge: C Michael Hill
Presiding Judge: Richard T Haik
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 3, 2016 15 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT ADOPTING 12 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED, and that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 8/3/16. (crt,Guidry, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Babin v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Ellis Babin, Jr
Represented By: Stephen M Morrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By: Katherine W Vincent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?