Roberts v. Wal-Mart Store Stores et al
| Sloane Roberts |
| Wal-Mart Store Stores, Jason Hebert, Jeffery Credeur, Sonny Stutes, Sammy Inzaraella and Jason Haines |
| 6:2015cv00119 |
| January 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lafayette Office |
| Vermilion |
| Rebecca F Doherty |
| Patrick J Hanna |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM RULING re 63 First MOTION to Vacate 58 Judgment, 55 Memorandum Ruling, 56 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Motion for Leave to File, filed by Sloane Roberts. Signed by Judge Robert R Summerhays on 1/14/2022. (crt,Bunting, M)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM RULING For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the following motions are GRANTED, with the following provisions: Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) and Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment 26 filed by defendant Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC (Wal-Mart);Motion to Join Wal-Marts Motion to Dismiss 28 , filed by defendant Sonny Stutes; Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) and Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment 29 filed by defendant Jason Hebert (Hebert), indivi dually and in his official capacity as a police officer for the City of Abbeville. IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiffs federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as prescribed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs state law claims for false arre st, false imprisonment, defamation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress -- as well as the claim for malicious prosecution to the extent it is alleged under state law -- and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the plaintiffs ability to attempt to assert the claims in the appropriate state forum, as the Court declines to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction over the aforementioned state law claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following motions are DENIED AS MOOT: Motion to Dismiss Pla intiffs Supplemental and Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) filed by Wal-Mart 41 ; Sonny Stutes Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Supplemental and Amended Complaint 48 ; Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Supplemental and Amended Compla int Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and (e), filed by Officer Jason Hebert 49 . It appears the instant Ruling resolves all disputes between the parties. In light of the foregoing, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a proposed judgment, approved as to form, within ten (10) days of the date of this Ruling and Order.Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 11/02/16. (crt,Guidry, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
