Schaffer Family Investors L L C et al v. Kris Melancon Estate et al
| Schaffer Family Investors L L C and Robert Schaffer |
| Kris Melancon Estate, Parker Yelverton, Pinnacle Oil & Gas L L C and Lemel Petroleum L L C |
| 6:2015cv00647 |
| March 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lafayette Office |
| St. Martin |
| Rebecca F Doherty |
| Patrick J Hanna |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM RULING After this Court's de novo review of the issues presented, this Court declines to adopt the findings of the magistrate judge and concludes the 14 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Petition Pursuant to Rules 12 (b)(6) and 12(b)(7) filed by Lemel Petroleum L L C, Parker Yelverton, Kris Melancon Estate, Pinnacle Oil & Gas L L C should be DENIED in its entirety, for the following reasons. IT IS ORDERED that the 14 Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively, M otion to Stay Action is DENIED. Specifically, the plaintiffs are ordered to amend their complaint with regard to their claims arising under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and 1934 as discussed herein. The defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to join a required party is DENIED. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 11/24/15. (crt,Guidry, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
