Lebrun v. Baker Hughes Inc et al
| Jonathan Lebrun |
| Transocean Ltd and Baker Hughes Inc |
| 6:2015cv01828 |
| June 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lafayette Office |
| Acadia |
| Rebecca F Doherty |
| C Michael Hill |
| Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 0688 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
MEMORANDUM RULING re 83 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol B Whitehurst on 11/14/2017. (crt,Chicola, C)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER: As no new arguments have been presented which alter the reasoning or the conclusion reached by the Court on Plaintiff's 59 Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff's 112 Motion for New Trial must be denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol B Whitehurst on 10/16/2017. (crt,Chicola, C)
|
|
Filing
108
MEMORANDUM RULING re 59 MOTION for Summary Judgment on plaintiff's Sieracki seaman status filed by Jonathan Lebrun. The Court finds that oral argument on this Motion is not necessary. For the reasons that follow, the Motion will be denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol B Whitehurst on 9/18/2017. (crt,Chicola, C)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM RULING setting forth reasons for denying 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment On Plaintiff's Seaman Status, and granting 21 MOTION for Summary Judgmen. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 6/14/16. (crt,Whidden, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
