Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Behind The Fence L L C et al
Joe Hand Promotions Inc |
Behind The Fence L L C, Amy Felecie' Hebert and James Wheaton |
6:2016cv00196 |
February 11, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Lafayette Office |
St. Landry |
Rebecca F Doherty |
Carol B Whitehurst |
Cable/Satellite TV |
47 U.S.C. ยง 0605 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 70 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff, Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.'s, Motion For Default Judgment as to Behind The Fence LLC 55 , be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART and Plaintiff, Joe Hand Promotions, Inc., be awarded a total of $2,900 against Behind the Fence LLC: an award of $1450 in statutory damages under 47 U.S.C. § 553(c)(3)(A)(ii) ($950 for the foregone sublicense fee and $500 for Behind The Fences estimated profit s); an award of $1450 in enhanced damages under 47 U.S.C. § 553(c)(3)(B); and no award for attorneys fees and costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Set Aside Judgment Of Default filed by defendants Amy Felicie Hebert and James A. Wheaton 60 be DENIED. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 4/24/2017. (crt,Guidry, C) |
Filing 53 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 50 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default 13 filed by defendants Amy Felicie Hebert and James A. Wheaton is DENIED. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 9/28/16. (crt,Guidry, C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.