LaFosse v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp et al
| Kalob LaFosse |
| Anadarko Petroleum Corp and Magnolia Torque & Testing Inc |
| 6:2016cv00364 |
| March 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lafayette Office |
| Acadia |
| Rebecca F Doherty |
| Patrick J Hanna |
| Marine |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 0901 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Anadarko Petroleum Corporation's 38 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED, consistent with the 53 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge W Eugene Davis on 3/20/2018. (crt,Guidry, C)
|
|
Filing
16
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 15 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days of this date, Kalob Lafosse may amend his complaint to state a valid claim against Magnolia Torque and Testing, Inc. for damages other than the remedies afforded under the benefits provisions of the LHWCA. If such a claim cannot be made within the parameters of Fed.R.Civ.P.11, within fourteen (14) days of this date, plaintiff shall dismiss his claims against Magnolia Torque and Testing, Inc. least he be subject to sanctions under that rule. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 7 Motion to Dismiss is denied without prejudice to Magnolia Torque and Testing, Inc.'s right to re-assert the motion after amendment.. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 6/30/16. (crt,Guidry, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
