Venable v. Schlumberger Technology Corp et al
| Jack V Venable, Jr |
| Schlumberger Technology Corp, Schlumberger Group Welfare Benefits Plan, Schlumberger Group Welfare Benefits Plan Administrative Committee and Metropolitan Life Insurance Co |
| 6:2016cv01336 |
| September 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lafayette Office |
| Lafayette |
| Rebecca F Doherty |
| Carol B Whitehurst |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Metropolitan Life Insurance Company's Motion To Dismiss against Plaintiff, Jack V. Venable, Jr. (Rec. Doc. 51 ), is GRANTED and Plaintiff, Jack V. Venable, Jr.'s claims for STD and LTD benefits and attorney's fees, costs and interest under Count V, and for statutory penalties under Count IV of his Complaint are dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol B Whitehurst on 4/13/2018. (crt,Chicola, C)
|
|
Filing
49
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 39 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants, Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Smith International, Inc., Schlumberger Group Welfare Benefits Plan and the Administrative Committee of Schlumberger Group Welfare Benefits Plan's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Rec. Doc. 17 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 4/24/2017. (crt,Guidry, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
