Strauss v. University of Louisiana System Board of Supervisors et al
Fabian R Strauss |
University of Louisiana System Board of Supervisors, Carol Landry and University of Louisiana Lafayette |
6:2017cv00235 |
February 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Lafayette Office |
Lafayette |
Rebecca F Doherty |
Carol B Whitehurst |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 19 Report and Recommendations, granting in part and denying in part 8 MOTION to Dismiss, MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. The motion to dis miss all claims against UL is granted and dismissed with prejudice. The motion to dismiss all claims against Dr. Landry in her individual capacity is granted and dismissed with prejudice. The claims against Dr. Landry in her official capacity are not dismissed at this time. The Motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim of failure to provide adequate housing accommodations prior to February 5, 2016 is granted and dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend his complaint by November 16, 2017. The motion to dismiss plaintiff's claims of failure to provide adequate academic accommodations prior to February 5, 2016 is denied. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 10/26/2017. (crt,ThomasSld, T) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.