A & E Office Machines Inc et al v. Edge I & D et al
| Adam Crappel, Jr and A & E Office Machines Inc |
| Kraig Cho and Edge I & D |
| 6:2018cv00895 |
| July 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lafayette Office |
| Calcasieu |
| Carol B Whitehurst |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #1 Complaint, sent to Adam Michael Crepelle on behalf of A & E Office Machines Inc. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 7/24/2018. (crt,ThomasSld, T) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kraig Cho, Edge I & D. (crt,ThomasSld, T) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Edge I & D, Kraig Cho (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0536-3698676) filed by A & E Office Machines Inc, Adam Crappel. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Adam Michael Crepelle added to party A & E Office Machines Inc(pty:pla), Attorney Adam Michael Crepelle added to party Adam Crappel(pty:pla))(aty,Crepelle, Adam) Modified to edit docket text on 7/10/2018 (ThomasSld, T). |
| CASE Assigned to Unassigned District Judge and Magistrate Judge Carol B Whitehurst. (crt,ThomasSld, T) |
| DIVISIONAL TRANSFER of Old Case Number 2:18-cv-0895 from Lake Charles Division to Lafayette Division. New Case Number 6:18-cv-0895. (crt,ThomasSld, T) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
