Jackson v. A T & T Retirement Savings Plan et al
Samantha J Jackson |
A T & T Pension Benefit Plan Mobility Program, Fidelity Investments, A T & T Retirement Savings Plan, A T & T Inc and A T & T Services Inc |
6:2019cv00116 |
January 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Patrick J Hanna |
Michael J Juneau |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against A T & T Inc, A T & T Pension Benefit Plan Mobility Program, A T & T Retirement Savings Plan, A T & T Services Inc, Fidelity Investments with Jury Demand filed by Samantha J Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(crt,FinnSld, P) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to A T & T Inc, A T & T Pension Benefit Plan Mobility Program, A T & T Retirement Savings Plan, A T & T Services Inc, Fidelity Investments. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
CASE Assigned to Judge Michael J Juneau and Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against A T & T Inc, A T & T Pension Benefit Plan Mobility Program, A T & T Retirement Savings Plan, A T & T Services Inc and Fidelity Investments with Jury Demand (Receipt number 64635007526, filing fee $400) filed by Samantha J Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibits)(crt,Devillier, W) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.