Schmidt v. Prince
Petitioner: Richard Schmidt
Respondent: Howard Prince
Case Number: 6:2020cv00555
Filed: May 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Richard Schmidt. (aty,Harrell, Justin)
May 1, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number ALAWDC-4252159) filed by Richard Schmidt. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum / Brief, #2 Exhibit Affidavit, #3 Exhibit Affidavit, #4 Exhibit Fifth Circuit Authorization for Successive Filing)(Attorney Justin Caine Harrell added to party Richard Schmidt(pty:pet))(aty,Harrell, Justin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schmidt v. Prince
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Howard Prince
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard Schmidt
Represented By: Justin Caine Harrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?