Guidry v. Cormier et al
Matthew James Guidry |
Detective Martin Cormier, The City of Breaux Bridge, Louisiana, ABC Insurance Company, Martin Cormier, City of Breaux Bridge and A B C Insurance Co |
6:2020cv01430 |
November 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Patrick J Hanna |
Robert R Summerhays |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Matthew James Guidry. City of Breaux Bridge waiver sent on 11/11/2020, answer due 1/11/2021. (aty,Goode, William) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Matthew James Guidry. Martin Cormier waiver sent on 11/11/2020, answer due 1/11/2021. (aty,Goode, William) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to City of Breaux Bridge, Martin Cormier. (crt,Crick, S) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against A B C Insurance Co, Martin Cormier, City of Breaux Bridge with Jury Demand (Filing fee $400, receipt number ALAWDC-4454669) filed by Matthew James Guidry. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Attorney William L Goode added to party Matthew James Guidry(pty:pla))(aty,Goode, William) Modified on 11/5/2020 to modify docket text. (Crick, S). |
CASE Assigned to Judge Robert R Summerhays and Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna. (crt,Crick, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.