George v. Warden
| Bacardney George and Bacardny George |
| Warden and Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary |
| 6:2020cv01590 |
| December 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Patrick J Hanna |
| Robert R Summerhays |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Bacardney George. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff failed to submit documents on approved forms. Plaintiff failed to submit filing fee or a completed IFP application. ( Pro Se Deadline to comply with deficiency set for 1/19/2021). Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna on 12/18/2020. (Attachments: #1 2254 Habeas Petition, #2 IFP Application)(crt,Thomas, T)
|
| Filing 2 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 12/10/2020. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Robert R Summerhays and Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| Filing 1 DEFICIENT PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Bacardney George. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope)(crt,Chavis, J). Petition not on approved form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
