LeBouef et al v. Keystone R V Co
| Susan Breaux LeBouef and Brian Anthony LeBouef |
| Keystone RV Company and Keystone R V Co |
| 6:2021cv01492 |
| June 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Patrick J Hanna |
| Michael J Juneau |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1332. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna on 7/16/2021. (crt,Randall, E) |
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for 9/12/2022 09:30 AM in Lafayette, Courtroom 1 before Judge Michael J Juneau. Pretrial Conference set for 8/19/2022 09:30 AM in chambers before Judge Michael J Juneau. Initial Disclosures exchanged by 8/5/2021. Rule 26 Conference between parties to take place before 8/9/2021. Rule 26 Report due by 9/2/2021. Joinder of Parties and Amendment of Pleadings due by 2/22/2022. Plaintiffs Expert Info/Reports due by 1/21/2022. Defendants Expert Info/Reports due by 2/22/2022. Discovery deadline 3/22/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 4/21/2022. Daubert Motions due by 4/21/2022. Motions in Limine due by 7/20/2022. Conference/Meeting of counsel to prepare pretrial order to be held by 7/20/2022. Pretrial Order due by 8/5/2022. Bench Books due by 8/5/2022. Trial Depositions due by 8/5/2022. Real Time glossary due by 8/12/2022. Affirmation of Settlement Negotiations due 8/12/2022. Signed by direction of the Court s/Christine Guidry on 7/15/2021. (crt,Guidry, C)
|
| Filing 6 MINUTES for proceedings held with Courtroom Deputy: SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held on 7/15/2021. Following discussion, a trial date of September 12, 2022 and a pretrial date of August 19, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. were selected. A scheduling order will be issued. (crt,Guidry, C) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ENTRY: At the direction of the Court, a Telephone Scheduling Conference will be held on July 15, 2021, at 3:00 p.m. for the purpose of scheduling a pretrial conference and trial on the merits, with the Courtroom Deputy. Counsel shall call in to the conference by dialing 1-877-411-9748 and using access code 6925887. (Scheduling Conference set for 7/15/2021 03:00 PM in by phone with Courtroom Deputy.)(crt,Guidry, C) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Keystone R V Co identifying Corporate Parent Thor Industries Inc for Keystone R V Co. (aty,Rauschenberger, Henry) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Keystone R V Co.(Attorney Henry Steven Rauschenberger added to party Keystone R V Co(pty:dft))(aty,Rauschenberger, Henry) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Keystone R V Co. (crt,Miletello, A) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Michael J Juneau and Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna. (crt,Miletello, A) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Keystone R V Co with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-4691764) filed by Brian Anthony LeBouef, Susan Breaux LeBouef. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Proposed summons/writ)(Attorney Richard C Dalton added to party Brian Anthony LeBouef(pty:pla), Susan Breaux LeBouef(pty:pla))(aty,Dalton, Richard) Modified docket text on 6/2/2021 (Miletello, A). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
