Alfred v. Saul
| Nirca Alfred |
| Andrew Saul |
| 6:2023cv00681 |
| May 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| David J Ayo |
| Donald E Walter |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER issued. (crt,Crick, S) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J Ayo on 6/7/2023. (crt,Crick, S)
|
| SERVICE of Complaint on the Commissioner of Social Security through the United States Attorney's Office by the Courts electronic case management system pursuant to the Supplemental Rules for Social Security actions Under 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g). Andrew Saul served on 6/7/2023, answer due 8/7/2023. (crt,Crick, S) |
| NOTICE of Corrective Action regarding #3 Social Security Scheduling Order, Service of Complaint on USA (Social Security). Action taken: Terminated Service of Complaint, answer due date and #3 Social Security Scheduling Order. Issued in error. (crt,Crick, S) |
| Filing 3 ISSUED IN ERROR. SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER issued. (crt,Crick, S) Modified on 6/7/2023 to indicate issued in error. (Crick, S). |
| ISSUED IN ERROR. SERVICE of Complaint on the Commissioner of Social Security through the United States Attorney's Office by the Courts electronic case management system pursuant to the Supplemental Rules for Social Security actions Under 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g). Andrew Saul served on 5/23/2023, answer due 7/24/2023. (crt,Crick, S) Modified on 6/7/2023 to indicate issued in error. (Crick, S). |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Donald E Walter and Magistrate Judge David J Ayo. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge David J Ayo. (crt,Crick, S) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperas by Nirca Alfred. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 5/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(aty,Mitchell, Guy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Complaint For Review of A Social Security Disability or Supplental Security Income Decision against Andrew Saul (In Forma Pauperis status requested and/or granted) filed by Nirca Alfred. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit Notice of Decision - Unfavorable, #3 Exhibit Notice of Appeals Council Action, #4 Exhibit Jurisdiction and Procedural History, #5 Exhibit Order of Appeals Council)(Attorney Guy O Mitchell, III added to party Nirca Alfred(pty:pla))(aty,Mitchell, Guy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Alfred v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nirca Alfred | |
| Represented By: | Guy O Mitchell, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Shannon Thornhill Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
