B N S F Railway Co v. Goehring et al
| B N S F Railway Co |
| Dean Arlyn Goehring, Jr and Sparhawk Trucking Inc |
| 6:2024cv00478 |
| April 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| David C Joseph |
| Carol B Whitehurst |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Dean Arlyn Goehring, Jr and Sparhawk Trucking Inc. (crt,Miletello, A) |
| Filing 3 DIVERSITY JURISDICTION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT for Plaintiff & Defendants by B N S F Railway Co. (aty,Gideon, Kyle) Modified docket text on 4/9/2024 (Miletello, A). |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by B N S F Railway Co identifying Corporate Parent Burlington Northern Santa Fe L L C; Other Affiliates National Indemnity Co, Berkshire Hathaway Inc for B N S F Railway Co. (aty,Gideon, Kyle) Modified docket text on 4/9/2024 (Miletello, A). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dean Arlyn Goehring, Jr., Sparhawk Trucking, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405, receipt number ALAWDC-5910106) filed by BNSF Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Kyle L Gideon added to party BNSF Railway Company(pty:pla))(aty,Gideon, Kyle) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge David C Joseph and Magistrate Judge Carol B Whitehurst. (crt,Miletello, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
