Yu v. Attao
Qun Yu and Yu Qun |
Vincent S. Attao |
1:2018cv00028 |
November 8, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mariana Islands |
Ramona V Manglona |
Frances M Tydingco-Gatewood |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Mailing re #4 Order Dismissing Case, #5 Clerk's Judgment. (Attachments: #1 Copy of Postage) (BTC) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court, Heather L. Kennedy on 01/07/2019. (BTC) |
Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Designated Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood on 01/03/2019. (BTC) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Mailing re #2 Order of Recusal and Reassignment. (FPA) |
Filing 2 ORDER OF RECUSAL and Reassignment. Chief Judge Ramona V. Manglona recused. Case reassigned to Designated Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood for all further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Ramona V. Manglona on 11/21/2018. (FPA) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Qun Yu. (Attachments: #1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody, #2 Motion to Disqualify or Recuse Yourself and Reassignment, #3 Notice of Motions, #4 Motion of Request to Exceeded More Pages in Memorandum of Law, #5 Motion for the Appointment of Counsel, #6 Declaration in Support of Petitioner's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel, #7 Memorandum of Law, #8 Evidence of Record (E.R.) Appendix) (ADE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.