Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd. v. Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), LLC et al
Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd. |
Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), LLC, Does 1-50 and Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), Ltd. |
1:2021cv00034 |
October 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mariana Islands |
Ramona V Manglona |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 4 Defendant Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), LLC's ANSWER to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Damages & Demand for Trial by Jury and Affirmative Defenses. Related document: #2 Amended Complaint, filed by Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd. (San Nicolas, Joey) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Joey P. San Nicolas on behalf of Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), LLC (San Nicolas, Joey) |
Filing 2 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT for Damages and Demand for Trial by Jury filed by Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd. against Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), Ltd., Imperial Pacific International (CNMI) LLC, AND Does 1-50, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Seman, Vincent) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Demand for Trial by Jury against Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), LLC and Does 1-50 filed by Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.Filing Fee: $402.00, Receipt Number: MPX100006572. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (LCG) |
Summons Issued as to Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), LLC. (LCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.