The Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic v. Baldwin et al
| The Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic |
| John K. Baldwin, Bridge Capital LLC., Lao Holdings N.V. and Sanum Investments LTD. |
| 1:2022cv00011 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mariana Islands |
| Ramona V Manglona |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 PETITION to Enforce Foreign Arbitral Awards. (Filing Fee: $402.00, Receipt Number: MPX100006885.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Agreement on encouragement and reciprocal protection of investments between Lao and Netherlands - Netherlands-Lao BIT, #3 Exhibit B - Award dated August 6, 2019 between Netherlands and Lao, #4 Exhibit C - Encouragement and Agreement between Lao and China, #5 Exhibit D - Award dated August 6, 2019 between China and Lao, #6 Exhibit E - Deed of Settlement, #7 Exhibit F - Declaration of Kelly Glass in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint, #8 Exhibit G - SIAC Award, #9 Exhibit H - Agreement on Subrogated Rights, #10 Exhibit I - Judgment Pursuant to ORC, #11 Exhibit Costs Against LHNV-Sanum) (LCG) |
| Summons Issued as to Sanum Investments LTD. (LCG) |
| Summons Issued as to Lao Holdings N.V. (LCG) |
| Summons Issued as to Bridge Capital LLC.. (LCG) |
| Summons Issued as to John K. Baldwin. (LCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
