Frederick v. Federal-Mogul, Incorporated
1:2006cv11549 |
March 31, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Unassigned |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 189 ORDER denying 160 Motion for Sanctions; denying 175 Motion for Sanctions and overruling Plaintiff's Objections to Costs Taxed and Bill of Costs. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (SGam) |
Filing 171 ORDER denying 156 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 166 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to 160 MOTION for Sanctions (Responses due by 2/23/2009). Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (SGam) |
Filing 155 ORDER denying 114 Sealed Motion; granting 115 Sealed Motion; denying 116 Sealed Motion; granting 152 Sealed Motion, complaint is dismissed. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (DHam) |
Filing 125 ORDER denying 109 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 112 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; granting plaintiff's request to file excess pages and extend time to respond; denying 113 Motion to Stay; denying 119 Motion to Stay and Scheduling Hearing. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (SGam) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Frederick v. Federal-Mogul, Incorporated | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.