Doe v. Merril Community School District et al
| Jane Doe |
| Merril Community School District, John Searles, Chris Garno, Dan Armentrout, Brent Brown, Jill Dubay, John Johnston, Sarah Kipfmiller, Elizabeth Wietfeld and Christine Porras |
| 1:2008cv11539 |
| April 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Bay City Office |
| Saginaw |
| Binder |
| Ludington |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| No cause code entered |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 35 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles E Binder. (JBro)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles E Binder. (JBro)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment or to Dismiss, Dismissing Plaintiff's Title IX Claims Against Individually-Named Defendants with Prejudice, Dismissing Plaintiff's §1983 Claim s Against the Individually-Named Defendants with Prejudice on the Basis of Qualified Immunity, Dismissing Plaintiff's §1983 Claims Against Defendant Merrill with Prejudice, granting 34 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint and to Add Party Defendants, and Granting Plaintiff Leave to Join Proposed Defendants. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (CGre)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
