Hastings v. Ludwick
Petitioner: William Hastings
Respondent: Nick Ludwick
Case Number: 1:2008cv13478
Filed: August 12, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Bay City Office
County: Gratiot
Presiding Judge: Ludington
Presiding Judge: Pepe
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 22 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S 16 MOTION TO AMEND THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, DENYING 17 MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS AND HOLD THE PETITION IN ABEYANCE, DISMISSING THE PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (DWor)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hastings v. Ludwick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Hastings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nick Ludwick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?