Choiniere v. Citchen et al
| Bruno Choiniere |
| Robin Wilson, Moody, Iris D Guidry, Arturo Aviles, S Citchen, C Eichenlaub and Federal Bureau of Prisons |
| 1:2008cv14853 |
| November 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Bay City Office |
| Washtenaw |
| Ludington |
| Whalen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| No cause code entered |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER Adopting 83 Report and Recommendation, Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (DEld) Modified on 3/22/2010 (DEld).
|
|
Filing
83
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Bruno Choiniere, 25 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Iris D Guidry, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Tiffany Wilson, Robin Wilson, S Citchen, Arturo Aviles, V Tokarz, Moody, 58 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Bruno Choiniere Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (SJef)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Adopting 32 Report and Recommendation and Denying 8 Motion for Issuance of Court Official Notice to Defendants filed by Bruno Choiniere Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (LHac)
|
|
Filing
32
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 8 MOTION for issuance of court official notice to defendants that any bad faith and abuse of discretion in regards to plaintiff's conditions of confinement, will result in the deprivation of his constitutional and civil rights filed by Bruno Choiniere Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (SJef)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
