Schafer et al v. Johanson et al
| Henry Block and Bernard J Schafer |
| Alexander Capital Markets, Mitchell Matt Donnelly, Jesse Churley, David R Johanson, Theresa Huang, Rachel Markun, Rhonda Connor, Johanson and Berenson, LLP, Bob Eddy, Sierra ESOT Advisors, Wachovia Securities, Jesup and Lamont Securities, William D Chapman, Business Appraisal Institute, Robert Strauss, T and C Bank and Emerging Money Corporation |
| 1:2009cv10349 |
| January 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Bay City Office |
| Isabella |
| Binder |
| Ludington |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER Dismissing Complaint as to defendants Bob Eddy, Jesup and Lamont Securities, Sierra ESOT Advisors, Alexander Capital Markets and William D Chapman, for failure to prosecute. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (NHol)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER denying 56 Motion to Stay District Court Proceedings, Authorizing Discovery and Setting Discovery and Motion Deadlines. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (SGam)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER denying without prejudice 9 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 17 Motion to Dismiss; denying without prejudice 21 Motion for Affirmative Relief. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (SGam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
