Lowden et al v. Clare, County of et al
| Lewis Lowden and Robert Lowden |
| Lawrence Kahsin, Clare, County of and Calvin Woodcock |
| 1:2009cv11209 |
| April 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Bay City Office |
| Gratiot |
| Binder |
| Ludington |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 81 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 88 Motion for Summary Judgment; Dismissing Clare County; Canceling Final Pretrial Conference and Motions Hearing; Scheduling Status conference; Granting Renewed Request for Declaratory Relief. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER denying without prejudice 59 Motion for Declaratory Judgment. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
|
Filing
58
OPINION and ORDER Regarding Declaratory Relief. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (SGam)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER denying without prejudice 39 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion to Dismiss 20 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying in part and denying without prejudice in part 31 Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings and Granting Leave to File Briefs Regarding Declaratory Relief. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. [Refer to image for dates] (SGam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
