Wygant et al v. Strand et al
Shawn Wygant, AW, JW, GW and NW |
Mary Strand and Michigan Department of Human Services |
1:2009cv11684 |
May 4, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Bay City Office |
Wayne |
Binder |
Ludington |
Civil Rights: Other |
No cause code entered |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 ORDER denying 40 Motion to Vacate; denying 41 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam) |
Filing 34 ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Complaint for Want of Prosecution. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam) |
Filing 30 OPINION and ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation and granting in part, denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss filed by Mary Strand, Michigan Department of Human Services, 17 Report and Recommendation Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (PPau) |
Filing 23 ORDER granting 20 Request for an extension of time to file objections filed by Shawn Wygant. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (SGam) |
Filing 10 ORDER Adopting 9 Report and Recommendation and Dismissing All Claims Asserted by Plaintiffs AW, JW, GW and NW through Shawn Wygant, Next Friend. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (CGre) |
Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that minor plaintiffs and their claims be sua sponte dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles E Binder. (JBro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.