Simpson v. Dice Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Michael J Simpson
Defendant: Dice Corporation and Clifford V. Dice
Case Number: 1:2010cv11465
Filed: April 13, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Bay City Office
County: Bay
Presiding Judge: Charles E Binder
Referring Judge: Thomas L Ludington
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STIPULATED ORDER DISMISSING CASE Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (TJac)
November 9, 2010 Filing 6 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Settlement Conference reset for 1/24/2011 03:00 PM before District Judge Thomas L Ludington (TJac)
June 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Settlement Conference set for 12/2/2010 04:00 PM before District Judge Thomas L Ludington Discovery due by 12/17/2010 Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 1/14/2011 Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/4/2011 03:30 PM before District Judge Thomas L Ludington Jury Trial set for 5/17/2011 08:30 AM before District Judge Thomas L Ludington Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (Refer to image for additional dates) (TJac)
April 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER to submit material for case management order., ( Responses due by 5/17/2010) Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (TJac)
April 16, 2010 Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Dice Corporation (Horn, Craig)
April 13, 2010 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses (Answer to First Amended Complaint) by All Defendants. (Horn, Craig)
April 13, 2010 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Clifford V. Dice, Dice Corporation from Bay County Circuit Court, case number 09-3561-CZ. Receipt No: 0645-2425251 - Fee: $ 350 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A-First Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit B-Circuit Court Removal Notice) (Horn, Craig)
April 13, 2010 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LHac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simpson v. Dice Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael J Simpson
Represented By: Amber L. Davis-Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dice Corporation
Represented By: Craig W. Horn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clifford V. Dice
Represented By: Craig W. Horn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?