Moore v. Bannon et al
| Walter Moore |
| Mary Bannon and John Doe |
| 1:2010cv12801 |
| July 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Bay City Office |
| Otsego |
| Charles E Binder |
| Thomas L Ludington |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER granting 41 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Prior Arrests and Convictions; granting 42 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Unrelated Lawsuits; granting 43 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Dismissed Parties and Dismissed Claims; denying 44 Motion in Limine to Exclude Police Reports; Order Supplemental Briefing and Rescheduling Trial. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER denying 34 Motion for Reconsideration; denying as moot 38 Motion to Adjourn Scheduling Dates. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Amending Scheduling Order. Motions terminated: 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment. (Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/24/2012 03:00 PM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington, Jury Trial set for 2/7/2012 08:30 AM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. [Refer to image for additional dates] (SGam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
