Flynn v. Wayne County Jail
Petitioner: Donald Flynn
Respondent: Wayne County Jail
Case Number: 1:2010cv13906
Filed: September 30, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Bay City Office
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: Thomas L Ludington
Presiding Judge: Virginia M Morgan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER denying 7 Motion for unlawful incarceration. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (TJac)
October 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OPINION and ORDER of DISMISSAL, Dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without prejudice and Denying a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (NHol)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flynn v. Wayne County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Donald Flynn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Wayne County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?