Bennett v. Correctional Medical Services
Plaintiff: Neil Bennett
Defendant: Correctional Medical Services
Case Number: 1:2012cv15405
Filed: December 4, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Lenawee
Presiding Judge: Thomas L. Ludington
Presiding Judge: R. Steven Whalen
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Conditions

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER denying 31 Motion for Relief from Judgment. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
February 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 24 OPINION and ORDER Overruling 23 Objections, adopting 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, granting 14 MOTION to Dismiss and Dismissing 1 Complaint With Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bennett v. Correctional Medical Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Neil Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correctional Medical Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?