Barcey v. Family Video Movie Club Inc
| Todd Barcey |
| Family Video Movie Club Inc |
| 1:2013cv10242 |
| January 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Saginaw |
| Charles E Binder |
| Thomas L Ludington |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 31
STIPULATED ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
| Filing 30 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Settlement Conference reset for 1/23/2014 04:00 PM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington (TJac) |
|
Filing 29
Stipulated ORDER Extending Time for Response to Plaintiff's First Discovery Requests. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
|
Filing 28
ORDER denying #27 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
| Filing 27 MOTION for Order (Unopposed) to Modify Scheduling Order by Family Video Movie Club Inc. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Brief in Support) (Lebowitz, Todd) |
|
Filing 26
ORDER Correcting #25 Scheduling Order. (Stipulation for case evaluation submitted by 11/22/2013) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
|
Filing 25
CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Settlement Conference set for 12/4/2013 04:00 PM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington Discovery due by 12/31/2013 Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 1/31/2014 Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/3/2014 02:00 PM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington Jury Trial set for 6/17/2014 08:30 AM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (Refer to image for additional dates) (TJac)
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER denying #12 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
| Filing 23 REPLY to Response re #12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Family Video Movie Club Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Hrivnak Complaint) (Lebowitz, Todd) |
| Filing 22 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re #16 Response to Motion filed by Todd Barcey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Hrivnak v NCO) (Petrik, Julie) |
|
Filing 21
STIPULATION AND ORDER holding in abeyance Plaintiff's #15 MOTION to Certify Class . Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
| Filing 20 REPLY to Response re #12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Family Video Movie Club Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Aliano v. Joe Caputo and Sons--Algonquin, Inc. No. 09-c-910, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48323, *12 (N.D. Ill. May 5, 2011), #2 Exhibit B - Young v. LVNV Funding, Inc., No. 4:12CV01180AGF, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162350, *13 (E.D. Mo. Nov. 14, 2012), #3 Exhibit C - C. Hartner Declaration) (Griswold, Joel) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Joel C. Griswold on behalf of Family Video Movie Club Inc. (Griswold, Joel) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER to Strike #17 Stipulation filed by Family Video Movie Club Inc, Todd Barcey. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (DWor)
|
| Filing 17 [STRICKEN] STIPULATION and Agreed Request to Hold in Abeyance Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification by All Parties (Lebowitz, Todd) Modified on 6/6/2013 (DWor). |
| TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: Hearing on July 29, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. is Cancelled re #12 MOTION to Dismiss - Order to be entered. (TJac) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE to #12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Todd Barcey. (Attachments: #1 Ex. 1 Stewart v Zeehandelar) (Petrik, Julie) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Certify Class by Todd Barcey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index, #2 Todd Barcey Affidavit, #3 Tchoboian Order Denying Summary Judgment, #4 Tchoboian Preliminary Approval Class Settlement, #5 Tchoboian Order Final Approval Class Settlement, #6 Declaration Ian Lyngklip) (Petrik, Julie) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Ian B. Lyngklip on behalf of Todd Barcey. (Lyngklip, Ian) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF HEARING on #12 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion Hearing set for 7/29/2013 04:00 PM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington (TJac) |
| Minute Entry - Scheduling Conference held on 5/7/2013 before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (TJac) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss by Family Video Movie Club Inc. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - 2013-03-22 JCG to Petrik enclosing Check No. 227878, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B - 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43734) (Lebowitz, Todd) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting in part #10 MOTION Rule 16 Telephonic Conference. (In-person Scheduling Conference set for 5/7/2013 04:00 PM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington). Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION Rule 16 Telephonic Conference re #9 Order, Set Deadlines/Hearings by Todd Barcey. (Petrik, Julie) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER to submit material for case management order., ( Responses due by 4/1/2013) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (TJac)
|
| Filing 8 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Family Video Movie Club Inc identifying Corporate Parent Family Video Movie Club, Inc. for Family Video Movie Club Inc. (Lebowitz, Todd) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Family Video Movie Club Inc. (Lebowitz, Todd) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: John A. Decker appearing on behalf of Family Video Movie Club Inc (Decker, John) |
|
Filing 5
STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time. (Response to complaint due by 3/15/2013) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Todd H. Lebowitz on behalf of Family Video Movie Club Inc. (Lebowitz, Todd) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Family Video Movie Club Inc served on 2/5/2013, answer due 2/26/2013. (Petrik, Julie) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Family Video Movie Club Inc* (DPer) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Todd Barcey against Family Video Movie Club Inc with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-3904423 - Fee: $ 350. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Petrik, Julie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barcey v. Family Video Movie Club Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Todd Barcey | |
| Represented By: | Ian B. Lyngklip |
| Represented By: | Julie A. Petrik |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Family Video Movie Club Inc | |
| Represented By: | John A. Decker |
| Represented By: | Todd H. Lebowitz |
| Represented By: | Joel C. Griswold |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
