Wilson v. Haas
Petitioner: Kevin Wilson
Respondent: Randall Haas
Case Number: 1:2013cv11213
Filed: March 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Paul J. Komives
Presiding Judge: Thomas L. Ludington
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying 8 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Kevin Wilson. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
May 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OPINION and ORDER Dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Denying Certificate of Appealability and Declining Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson v. Haas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Randall Haas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kevin Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?