McKay v. Federspiel et al
| Robert W McKay |
| William L. Federspiel and Randy F Pfau |
| 1:2014cv10252 |
| January 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Bay City Office |
| Tuscola |
| Charles E. Binder |
| Thomas L. Ludington |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
OPINION ORDER Granting 67 Defendants' Second Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying 68 Plaintiff's Second Motion for Summary Judgment, Dismissing Counts II & IV of First Amended Complaint Without Prejudice, and Denying Motions 53 and 54 for Certificate of Appealability as Moot. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (Sandusky, K)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER granting 57 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint. (Amended complaint due by 3/2/2015) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER denying 56 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER denying 35 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 44 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER denying 31 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER denying 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
