Marden v. Midland, County of et al
| Sharyl Marden |
| Midland, County of, Jeffery Derocher, Brian Keidel, Richard Speich, Joshua Michael Saylor, Richard Harnois and Bryan Kryzanowicz |
| 1:2015cv14504 |
| December 31, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Bay City Office |
| Midland |
| Thomas L. Ludington |
| Patricia T. Morris |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER Granting 79 Motion for Settlement Approval and Disposition of Proceeds. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER Directing Supplemental Briefing on Settlement Approval and Distribution of Proceeds. (Response due by 10/2/2017.) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER Granting Defendants' 49 51 Motions for Summary Judgment and Denying as Moot Defendants' 44 Motion Challenging Expert and 63 Motion to Strike Newly Added Experts. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (Sian, M)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Denying 19 MOTION to File Third Party Complaint and Extending Scheduling Order. (Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 1/19/2017, Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/2/2017 at 03:00 PM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington, and Jury Trial set for 5/16/2017 at 08:30 AM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (Sian, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
