Isaac Industries, Inc. v. BASF Corporation et al
| Isaac Industries, Inc. |
| Wanhua Chemical (America), Ltd., BASF SE, The Dow Chemical Company, BASF Corporation, Huntsman International LLC, Wanhua Chemical Group Co., Ltd., Covestro, LLC and Covestro, AG |
| 1:2018cv12089 |
| July 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Mona K Majzoub |
| Patricia T Morris |
| Stephen J Murphy |
| Victoria A Roberts |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Sharon S. Almonrode on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Almonrode, Sharon) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-6802775 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Midland County - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1-Wanhua Chemical to Build Plant in Louisiana, #3 Exhibit 2-Diisocyanate Explained, #4 Exhibit 3-Diisocyanate Explained, #5 Exhibit 4-Henry Hub, #6 Exhibit 5-Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, #7 Exhibit 6-Antitrust Division Manual, #8 Exhibit 7-About the Diisocyanate Panel, #9 Exhibit 8-CPI Members) (Miller, E.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
