Gatete v. Adducci et al
| Melody Selman Gatete |
| Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Warden Christopher Larose, Director Rebecca Adducci, Deputy Director Ronald Vitiello, Acting Atty General Matthew Whitaker and William P. Barr |
| 1:2019cv10443 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Thomas L Ludington |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
STIPULATED ORDER of Voluntary Dismissal. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
|
|
Filing 4
Stipulated ORDER Extending Time to File Responsive Pleading. (Response due by 3/7/2019.) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
|
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Jonathan Goulding appearing on behalf of Rebecca Adducci, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Ronald Vitiello, William P. Barr (Goulding, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Regarding Deportation filed by Melody Selman Gatete against Rebecca Adducci, Christopher Larose, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Ronald Vitiello, Matthew Whitaker, Receipt No: 0645-7108663 - Fee: 5 dollars. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Oral decision, Immigration Judge, #3 Exhibit Board of Immigration Appeals dismissal, #4 Exhibit Detention reviews, #5 Exhibit Letter of Good Conduct) (Boren, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
