Krause v. Dunham's Athleisure Corporation
Niki Krause |
Dunham's Athleisure Corporation |
1:2019cv10800 |
March 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Patricia T Morris |
George Caram Steeh |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 10/1/2019 Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 11/1/2019 Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/9/2020 10:00 AM before District Judge George Caram Steeh Jury Trial set for 3/24/2020 09:00 AM before District Judge George Caram Steeh Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (Refer to image for additional dates) (MBea) |
Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge George Caram Steeh: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 5/28/2019 (MBea) |
Filing 7 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Pelton, Eric) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Scheduling Conference set for 5/28/2019 03:00 PM before District Judge George Caram Steeh. Plaintiff's counsel shall arrange conference call. Discovery Plan due 5/21/19. (MBea) |
NOTICE of Error directed to: Daniel W. White re #5 Certificate of Service. Document is prohibited discovery, disclosure or a certificate of service thereof. Document was stricken. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (NAhm) |
Filing 5 [STRICKEN] CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Niki Krause (White, Daniel) Modified on 5/6/2019 (NAhm). |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Sarah L. Nirenberg appearing on behalf of Dunham's Athleisure Corporation (Nirenberg, Sarah) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Dunham's Athleisure Corporation. (Pelton, Eric) |
Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Dunham's Athleisure Corporation (Pelton, Eric) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Dunham's Athleisure Corporation from 26th Circuit Court for Alpena County, case number 19-8869-CZ. Receipt No: 0645-7156716 - Fee: $ 400 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Pelton, Eric) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DWor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Krause v. Dunham's Athleisure Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Niki Krause | |
Represented By: | Daniel W. White |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dunham's Athleisure Corporation | |
Represented By: | Eric J. Pelton |
Represented By: | Sarah L. Nirenberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.