Krause v. Dunham's Athleisure Corporation
Plaintiff: Niki Krause
Defendant: Dunham's Athleisure Corporation
Case Number: 1:2019cv10800
Filed: March 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Patricia T Morris
Referring Judge: George Caram Steeh
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 10/1/2019 Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 11/1/2019 Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/9/2020 10:00 AM before District Judge George Caram Steeh Jury Trial set for 3/24/2020 09:00 AM before District Judge George Caram Steeh Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (Refer to image for additional dates) (MBea)
May 28, 2019 Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge George Caram Steeh: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 5/28/2019 (MBea)
May 20, 2019 Filing 7 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Pelton, Eric)
May 7, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Scheduling Conference set for 5/28/2019 03:00 PM before District Judge George Caram Steeh. Plaintiff's counsel shall arrange conference call. Discovery Plan due 5/21/19. (MBea)
May 6, 2019 NOTICE of Error directed to: Daniel W. White re #5 Certificate of Service. Document is prohibited discovery, disclosure or a certificate of service thereof. Document was stricken. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (NAhm)
May 3, 2019 Filing 5 [STRICKEN] CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Niki Krause (White, Daniel) Modified on 5/6/2019 (NAhm).
March 25, 2019 Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Sarah L. Nirenberg appearing on behalf of Dunham's Athleisure Corporation (Nirenberg, Sarah)
March 25, 2019 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Dunham's Athleisure Corporation. (Pelton, Eric)
March 19, 2019 Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Dunham's Athleisure Corporation (Pelton, Eric)
March 18, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Dunham's Athleisure Corporation from 26th Circuit Court for Alpena County, case number 19-8869-CZ. Receipt No: 0645-7156716 - Fee: $ 400 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Pelton, Eric)
March 18, 2019 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DWor)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Krause v. Dunham's Athleisure Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Niki Krause
Represented By: Daniel W. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dunham's Athleisure Corporation
Represented By: Eric J. Pelton
Represented By: Sarah L. Nirenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?