United States of America v. Reznick et al
| United States of America |
| Robert J. Reznick |
| Adam Reznick |
| 1:2019mc51178 |
| August 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Thomas L Ludington |
| Patricia T Morris |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF HEARING on #4 MOTION to Dismiss Third-Party Petition of Adam Reznick For Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted. Motion Hearing set for 12/3/2019 at 2:30 PM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Third-Party Petition of Adam Reznick For Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted by United States of America. (Juncaj, Gjon) |
Filing 3
ORDER Directing a Response from Plaintiff re #1 Defendant's Statement of Interest. Government's Response due by 9/27/2019. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven M. Vitale on behalf of Adam Reznick. (Vitale, Steven) |
| Filing 1 Claimant Adam Reznick's Verified Statement of Interest and Petition to Adjudicate Validity of Interest filed by Adam Reznick , Receipt No: 0645-7366226 - Fee: 47 dollars. (Vitale, Steven) |
| [RELATED to criminal case # 19-20148 Dft 1] (DWor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
