Woloshik v. The Dow Chemical Company
Jeanne Woloshik |
The Dow Chemical Company |
1:2020cv10402 |
February 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Thomas L Ludington |
Patricia T Morris |
Civil Rights: Other |
29 U.S.C. ยง 203 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Case Management and SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 10/13/2020; Settlement Conference set for 10/21/2020 at 3:00 PM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington; Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 11/13/2020; Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/2/2021 at 2:00 PM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington; Jury Trial set for 3/16/2021 at 8:30 AM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (Refer to image for additional dates) (KWin) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Margaret C. Stalker appearing on behalf of The Dow Chemical Company (Stalker, Margaret) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda M. Fielder on behalf of The Dow Chemical Company. (Fielder, Amanda) |
Filing 6 ORDER to Submit Material for Case Management Order. (Short Statements Submitted to CM/Utilities/Proposed Orders by 4/13/2020.) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin) |
Filing 5 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by The Dow Chemical Company (Bardelli, Edward) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand (Reliance Upon) by The Dow Chemical Company. (Bardelli, Edward) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Kevin L. Kula appearing on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Kula, Kevin) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *The Dow Chemical Company* (LHos) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LHos) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7604362 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Midland - County Where Action Arose: Midland - County of 1st Defendant: Midland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Mastromarco, Victor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Woloshik v. The Dow Chemical Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Dow Chemical Company | |
Represented By: | Amanda M. Fielder |
Represented By: | Margaret C. Stalker |
Represented By: | Edward J. Bardelli |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jeanne Woloshik | |
Represented By: | Victor J. Mastromarco, Jr. |
Represented By: | Kevin L. Kula |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.