AL Sadoon v. Adducci et al
Ali AL Sadoon |
Detroit Field Office Rebecca Adducci, Mat King, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland and Tae D. Johnson |
1:2021cv11438 |
June 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Thomas L Ludington |
Patricia T Morris |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER Directing Response to #2 Motion for TRO. Response due by 8/20/202;1 Reply due by 9/8/2021. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Bradley Darling appearing on behalf of Rebecca Adducci, Merrick B. Garland, Tae D. Johnson, Alejandro Mayorkas (Darling, Bradley) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Ali AL Sadoon. (Driver, Shanta) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ali AL Sadoon against Rebecca Adducci, Merrick B. Garland, Tae D. Johnson, Mat King, Alejandro Mayorkas, Receipt No: AMIEDC-8505898 - Fee: $ 5. [Possible companion case: Eastern District of Michigan, 2:20-cv-10699, Judge Hon. David M. Lawson] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L) (Driver, Shanta) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.