Sawicki v. Bangor Township Schools
| Matthew Sawicki |
| Bangor Township Schools |
| 1:2021cv11497 |
| June 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Thomas L Ludington |
| Patricia T Morris |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Case Management and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 2/22/2022; Settlement Conference set for 3/8/2022 at 3:00 PM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington; Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 3/22/2022; Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/9/2022 at 3:00 PM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington; Jury Trial set for 8/23/2022 at 8:30 AM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (Refer to image for additional dates) (KWin)
|
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Kevin J. Kelly appearing on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Kelly, Kevin) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Green Card) (Kelly, Kevin) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER to Submit Material for Case Management Order. (Short Statements Submitted to CM/Utilities/Proposed Orders by 8/11/2021. ) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Bangor Township Schools. (Mair, Gregory) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Gregory W. Mair appearing on behalf of Bangor Township Schools (Mair, Gregory) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Kevin J. Kelly appearing on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Kelly, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Bangor Township Schools* (DPer) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by All Plaintiffs (Mastromarco, Victor) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8514248 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Bay - County Where Action Arose: Bay - County of 1st Defendant: Bay. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Mastromarco, Victor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sawicki v. Bangor Township Schools | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bangor Township Schools | |
| Represented By: | Gregory W. Mair |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matthew Sawicki | |
| Represented By: | Victor J. Mastromarco, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Kevin J. Kelly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
