Murphy v. May et al
Plaintiff: William Murphy
Defendant: Joshua May and Michigan Department of State Police
Case Number: 1:2021cv12089
Filed: September 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Nancy G Edmunds
Referring Judge: Thomas L Ludington
2 Judge: Patricia T Morris
3 Judge: Anthony P Patti
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 AMENDED #1 Complaint,, by William Murphy (Nyeholt, Collin)
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 [NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AS TO] STIPULATION of Dismissal as to Defendant Michigan Department of State Police by William Murphy (Nyeholt, Collin) Modified on 11/2/2021 (KWin).
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Mary A. Waddell appearing on behalf of Joshua May (Waddell, Mary)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Mary A. Waddell appearing on behalf of Michigan Department of State Police (Waddell, Mary)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Michigan Department of State Police* (DPer)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Joshua May* (DPer)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer)
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Corrected Judicial Assignment due to Clerical Error: Reassigned from * District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds* and *Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti* to District Judge Thomas L. Ludington and Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris (JOwe)
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by William Murphy against Joshua May, Michigan Department of State Police with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8606997 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Saginaw - County Where Action Arose: Saginaw - County of 1st Defendant: Saginaw. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Verification of Complaint) (Nyeholt, Collin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murphy v. May et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Murphy
Represented By: Collin H. Nyeholt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joshua May
Represented By: Mary A. Waddell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michigan Department of State Police
Represented By: Mary A. Waddell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?