Ketover v. Kiplinger Washington Editors, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jay Ketover and Ralph Strano
Defendant: Kiplinger Washington Editors, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv12987
Filed: December 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Thomas L Ludington
Referring Judge: Patricia T Morris
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Ralph Strano against Kiplinger Washington Editors, Inc.. NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Kiplinger's Personal Finance Mailing List, #3 Exhibit B - Privacy: Sales, Rentals of Videos, etc., House Legislative Analysis Section, H.B. No. 5331, Jan. 20, 1989, #4 Exhibit C - The Information Marketplace: Merging and Exchanging Consumer Data (Mar. 13, 2001), #5 Exhibit D - Webs Hot New Commodity: Privacy, WSJ (Feb. 28, 2011), #6 Exhibit E - Statement of FTC Commissioner Pamela Jones Harbour (Dec. 7, 2009), #7 Exhibit F - Martha C. White, Big Data Knows What Youre Doing Right Now, TIME.com (July 31, 2012), #8 Exhibit G - Natasha Singer, You for Sale: Mapping, and Sharing, the Consumer Genome, N.Y. Times (June 16, 2012), #9 Exhibit H - Letter from Senator John D. Rockefeller IV, Chairman, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, to Scott E. Howe, Chief Executive Officer, Acxiom (Oct. 9, 2012), #10 Exhibit I - Bipartisan Group of Lawmakers Query Data Brokers About Practices Involving Consumers Personal Information, Website of Senator Ed Markey (July 24, 2012), #11 Exhibit J - Prize Scams, Federal Trade Commission, #12 Exhibit K - Charles Duhigg, Bilking the Elderly, With a Corporate Assist, N.Y. Times, May 20, 2007, #13 Exhibit L - Fraud Against Seniors: Hearing before the Senate Special Committee on Aging (August 10, 2000), #14 Exhibit M - 2014 TRUSTe US Consumer Confidence Privacy Report, TRUSTe, #15 Exhibit N - Joshua Brustein, Start-Ups Seek to Help Users Put a Price on Their Personal Data, N.Y. Times (Feb. 12, 2012), #16 Exhibit O - Tsai, Cranor, Acquisti, and Egelman, The Effect of Online Privacy Information on Purchasing Behavior, 22(2) Information Systems Research 254, 254 (2011), #17 Exhibit P - Hann, et al., The Value of Online Information Privacy: An Empirical Investigation (Oct. 2003), #18 Exhibit Q - Californias Reader Privacy Act Signed into Law, Electronic Frontier Foundation (Oct. 3, 2011)) (Miller, E.)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER re #7 Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to #1 Complaint. (Response due by 2/25/2022. ) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STIPULATION Regarding Time to Respond to Complaint by Kiplinger Washington Editors, Inc. (Anderson, David)
January 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Kiplinger Washington Editors, Inc. served on 1/4/2022, answer due 1/25/2022. (Miller, E.)
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Gregory A. Mitchell appearing on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Mitchell, Gregory)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Kiplinger Washington Editors, Inc.* (TTho)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice of Corrected Judicial Assignment due to Clerical Error: Reassigned from * District Judge Matthew F. Leitman* and *Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr.* to District Judge Thomas L. Ludington and Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris (SSch)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Sharon S. Almonrode appearing on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Almonrode, Sharon)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class Action filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8732006 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Midland County - County Where Action Arose: Midland County - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Kiplingers Personal Finance Subscribers Mailing List, #3 Exhibit B - Privacy: Sales, Rentals of Videos, etc., House Legislative Analysis Section, H.B. No. 5331, Jan. 20, 1989, #4 Exhibit C - The Information Marketplace: Merging and Exchanging Consumer Data (Mar. 13, 2001), #5 Exhibit D - Webs Hot New Commodity: Privacy, WSJ (Feb. 28, 2011), #6 Exhibit E - Statement of FTC Commissioner Pamela Jones Harbour (Dec. 7, 2009), #7 Exhibit F - Martha C. White, Big Data Knows What Youre Doing Right Now, TIME.com (July 31, 2012), #8 Exhibit G - Natasha Singer, You for Sale: Mapping, and Sharing, the Consumer Genome, N.Y. Times (June 16, 2012), #9 Exhibit H - Letter from Senator John D. Rockefeller IV, Chairman, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, to Scott E. Howe, Chief Executive Officer, Acxiom (Oct. 9, 2012), #10 Exhibit I - Bipartisan Group of Lawmakers Query Data Brokers About Practices Involving Consumers Personal Information, Website of Senator Ed Markey (July 24, 2012), #11 Exhibit J - Prize Scams, Federal Trade Commission, #12 Exhibit K - Charles Duhigg, Bilking the Elderly, With a Corporate Assist, N.Y. Times, May 20, 2007, #13 Exhibit L - Fraud Against Seniors: Hearing before the Senate Special Committee on Aging (August 10, 2000), #14 Exhibit M - 2014 TRUSTe US Consumer Confidence Privacy Report, TRUSTe, #15 Exhibit N - Joshua Brustein, Start-Ups Seek to Help Users Put a Price on Their Personal Data, N.Y. Times (Feb. 12, 2012), #16 Exhibit O - Tsai, Cranor, Acquisti, and Egelman, The Effect of Online Privacy Information on Purchasing Behavior, 22(2) Information Systems Research 254, 254 (2011), #17 Exhibit P - Hann, et al., The Value of Online Information Privacy: An Empirical Investigation (Oct. 2003), #18 Exhibit Q - Californias Reader Privacy Act Signed into Law, Electronic Frontier Foundation (Oct. 3, 2011)) (Miller, E.)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (TTho)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ketover v. Kiplinger Washington Editors, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jay Ketover
Represented By: Sharon S. Almonrode
Represented By: E. Powell Miller
Represented By: Gregory A. Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ralph Strano
Represented By: E. Powell Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kiplinger Washington Editors, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?